Â鶹´«Ã½

Skip to content

Opinion: What Trump presidency could mean for agri-food in Canada

Trump’s return could tilt the scales against Canadian agri-food industry.
american-flag-stock
Canadian farmers now face a more challenging landscape in the era of Trump presidency 2.0.

As Canadians recall the shock of Donald Trump’s first presidential victory, the news of his recent return to the White House has stirred both anxiety and anticipation. Trump’s re-election is undeniably a pivotal moment, and this time, Canadians may approach it with more reservation, reflecting on the changes his first term brought to our shared economy and agri-food trade.

During Trump’s first administration, Canada performed reasonably well economically, even amid intense political rhetoric and policy shifts. Our GDP per capita grew by 6.3 per cent, far more robust than the stagnant growth we are experiencing today. The agri-food trade between Canada and the U.S. also flourished, growing by almost 20 per cent from 2016 to 2020. Despite the “America First” focus, our food sector benefited from stronger cross-border trade – a trend that may continue, though with potentially higher stakes.

However, Canadian farmers now face a more challenging landscape. Trump’s campaign promises include measures to reduce costs for American farmers to enhance their competitiveness, while agricultural costs in Canada have steadily increased. Since 2019, wholesale food prices in Canada have risen nearly 40 per cent more than in the U.S., placing Canadian producers at a disadvantage and making it harder for them to compete. A second Trump administration could deepen this gap, increasing the pressure on Canada’s agricultural sector.

Environmental policies could also become a major point of contention. During his first term, Trump reversed over 100 environmental regulations, many of which President Joe Biden later reinstated. With Trump back in the Presidency, Canada’s already controversial carbon tax could put additional strain on cross-border trade. Since 2019, the carbon tax in Canada has increased from $20 per tonne to an expected $95 per tonne by 2025, drastically raising the cost burden on Canadian agriculture. Trump’s less restrictive environmental approach could give American farmers a cost advantage, leaving Canadian agriculture facing higher operational expenses.

Trump will also likely support an updated almost US$2 trillion Farm Bill, bolstering U.S. crop insurance, subsidies, and agri-food research to counter China’s global influence. With China tensions simmering, Canada may have to carefully navigate this increasingly competitive and politically fraught landscape. The likelihood of higher ethanol production and a continued hard line on Chinese tariffs, policies that the Biden administration largely upheld, underscores that Canada’s alignment with U.S. agricultural strategies will be critical to avoid potential trade disruptions.

In global trade, the stakes are equally high. The BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) are strengthening their alliances to counterbalance Western influence, and a more isolationist U.S. approach under Trump could force Canada to choose its alliances carefully. This strategic recalibration won’t be easy, as Canada’s role as a middle power may come under strain in a world more polarized between competing economic blocs.

On North American trade, Canada must confront a transactional approach from a Trump-led U.S. that may bring both predictability and hard-nosed negotiations. Trump’s proposed renegotiation of the North American trade agreement could mean sensitive areas like dairy will return to the bargaining table. Bill C-282, which would protect Canada’s supply management systems from future trade deal concessions, might be an early casualty. If enacted, Canada could face immediate pressure from the U.S. to scrap the legislation, complicating efforts to safeguard our agri-food sector’s unique protections.

Canada’s agri-food industry stands at a crossroads, where costs, environmental policy, and geopolitical pressures intersect. While Trump’s return might yield certain economic benefits, it would also challenge Canada’s trade policies, cost structures, and environmental standards. Canada’s agri-food stakeholders will need to prepare for complex adjustments with Trump’s second presidency.

Dr. Sylvain Charlebois, a Canadian professor and researcher specializing in food distribution and policy, is a senior director of the Agri-Food Analytics Lab at Dalhousie University and co-host of The Food Professor Podcast. He is frequently cited in the media for his insights on food prices, agricultural trends, and the global food supply chain.

©

The commentaries offered on Â鶹´«Ã½ are intended to provide thought-provoking material for our readers. The opinions expressed are those of the authors. Contributors' articles or letters do not necessarily reflect the opinion of any Â鶹´«Ã½ staff.

push icon
Be the first to read breaking stories. Enable push notifications on your device. Disable anytime.
No thanks