麻豆传媒

Skip to content

NOT REAL NEWS: A look at what didn't happen this week

A roundup of some of the most popular but completely untrue stories and visuals of the week. None of these are legit, even though they were shared widely on social media. The Associated Press checked them out.
5bd501d0-c1cd-4d7f-8afe-5ce1aebf3efd
FILE - Voters fill out their ballots for the Michigan primary election, Feb. 27, 2024, in Grosse Pointe Farms, Mich. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya, File)

A roundup of some of the most popular but completely untrue stories and visuals of the week. None of these are legit, even though they were shared widely on social media. The Associated Press checked them out.

___

CLAIM: A bill signed into law this week by Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer prohibits vote recounts based on election fraud allegations.

THE FACTS: The bill, , does not prohibit such recounts, according to two state senators involved in updating the laws around recounts. It stipulates that candidates may request a recount if they have a 鈥済ood-faith belief鈥 that they would have had a 鈥渞easonable chance鈥 to win the election if not for an 鈥渆rror鈥 in the vote counting process. That means that the number of votes the petitioning candidate requests to be recounted must be greater than the difference of votes between them and the winning candidate.

After Whitmer, a Democrat, on Monday, social media users misrepresented what it will mean for the ability to obtain recounts.

鈥淗oly Fvck! Michigan Gov. Whitmer signed bills into law that will prohibit election recounts conducted due to allegations of voter fraud,鈥 reads one X post that had received approximately 43,000 likes and 23,500 shares as of Friday. 鈥淒emocrats will stop at nothing to prevent election fraud from being exposed!鈥

But recounts can still be initiated by fraud allegations under SB 603, according to its sponsors. They say was written to make obtaining a comprehensive recount easier, if there is legitimate reason to believe it could change the result of an election, and to prevent frivolous ones. It also clarifies how suspected fraud should be investigated.

鈥淭his whole piece about fraud is just honestly based on a lot of misinterpretation, of which I think some of it鈥檚 probably intentional misinterpretation,鈥 said Democratic state Sen. Stephanie Chang, the bill鈥檚 primary sponsor.

State Sen. Jeremy Moss, the primary sponsor of a companion bill, SB 604, explained that SB 603 does the opposite of what the claims spreading online allege.

鈥淚t is modernizing the law so that all ballots can be subject to a recount,鈥 said the Democrat, who is chair of the Michigan Senate elections and ethics committee. 鈥淭his is making the integrity of the election results stronger. And this is subjecting more, if not all, ballots in a given election to a recount.鈥

that a candidate must 鈥渂e able to allege a good-faith belief that, but for error in the canvass or returns of the votes, the candidate would have a reasonable chance of winning the election.鈥 It further stipulates that 鈥渢he number of votes requested to be recounted must, at minimum, be greater than the difference in votes between the petitioning candidate and the winning candidate.鈥

Similar guidelines for ballot questions are outlined in the bill.

Accusations that the bill doesn鈥檛 allow for recounts because of fraud grow in part from a wording change in SB 603, which 鈥渇raud or mistake鈥 with 鈥渆rror.鈥 Chang and Moss explained that fraud is included under the error umbrella, and that the language was condensed in part because there have been candidates who were hesitant to request a recount if fraud wasn鈥檛 a concern.

Critics, however, have suggested that this change could be detrimental to a fair electoral process.

鈥淭hey ultimately work to discourage the notion that fraud could be a reason for a discrepancy,鈥 state Rep. Jay DeBoyer, a Republican who serves on the House elections committee, about SB 603 and SB 604. 鈥淭hat is an extremely reactive policy that discards transparency and doesn鈥檛 deliver a better elections system.鈥

State Rep. Jaime Greene, also a Republican, that 鈥渨atering down protections is counterproductive when several red flags have arisen within the state鈥檚 elections process.鈥

There have been instances where precincts couldn鈥檛 be recounted if they were 鈥渙ut of balance,鈥 meaning the number of people who signed into the poll book didn鈥檛 match the number of submitted ballots. During a recount of a close election for Detroit city clerk in 2017, for instance, votes from 33 precincts representing more than 7,000 votes couldn鈥檛 be re-tallied, according to local from that time.

One example of why a precinct might be out of balance is if a voter signs the poll book, but decides not to vote and throws out their ballot, or leaves the precinct with it. SB 603 is intended to ensure that more precincts will be eligible for recounts if necessary, so that all valid ballots can be included. The bill also adds and lowers thresholds for automatic recounts.

鈥淚t takes into account if there鈥檚 a reasonable explanation of why a precinct can be out of balance,鈥 Moss said.

Additionally, SB 603 clarifies the limits of a recount and stipulates that a board of canvassers, conducting recounts, is not responsible for investigating fraud. It states that a recount is 鈥渁n administrative process limited to determining the number of votes cast on ballots for each candidate seeking a particular office or determining the number of votes cast for or against a ballot question鈥 and not 鈥渁n investigation or an audit of the conduct of an election.鈥 Possible fraud should be reported to local prosecutors or the state attorney general, according to the bill.

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson in May reminding boards of canvassers that the state鈥檚 constitution and election law does not authorize them to conduct investigations. It explains that statutes 鈥渄efine the obligation of canvassers as a 鈥榤inisterial, clerical and nondiscretionary鈥 duty to certify election results based solely on election returns.鈥

Whitmer on Monday. It will go into effect the 91st day after the final adjournment of the Michigan legislature鈥檚 2024 regular session, which is currently scheduled to end .

___

CLAIM: A video shows a worker at a voter registration drive in Florida registering people to vote without asking for proof of citizenship.

THE FACTS: It鈥檚 true workers at the drive did not ask for proof of U.S. citizenship, but that鈥檚 because the law does not require such proof to register to vote. However, and law stipulates that Florida voters must be U.S. citizens to cast a ballot in any race. Voters confirm their citizenship under penalty of perjury. Noncitizen voting is in the U.S. as states, including Florida, have processes to prevent it.

Shortly before the U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday requiring to register to vote, social media users shared a video of a voter registration drive in Palm Beach, Florida, to raise questions about noncitizens voting in U.S. elections.

In the video, a worker with speaks with a man and a woman outside the Central Palm Beach Service Center. The pair questions the worker about whether people register to vote inside, why she and her colleagues are wearing blue shirts, if she is registered to vote, if she is a U.S. citizen, and who funds Mi Familia en Acci贸n.

The woman then asks the worker, 鈥淲hat do you have to have to sign up to vote? A driver鈥檚 license?鈥 The worker replies, 鈥淣o 鈥 no, no, no, you have to be a U.S. citizen. It鈥檚 a felony.鈥 After the woman asks how registrants prove their citizenship, the worker says that 鈥測ou have to trust in the people鈥 and reiterates that lying about U.S. citizenship on a voter registration form is a felony.

鈥溾楳i Familia Vota鈥 worker in Palm Beach is registering voters near the DMV,鈥 reads one X post that shared the video. 鈥淧roof of citizenship isn鈥檛 required.鈥 It had received approximately 21,000 likes and 11,700 shares as of Wednesday.

The video was first posted on X by Jeff Buongiorno, a Republican candidate for supervisor of elections in Palm Beach County. Buongiorno asked whether this is 鈥渨hat Floridian鈥檚 had in mind鈥 when the state constitution in 2020 to require voters in Florida elections to be U.S. citizens.

Mi Familia en Acci贸n and are nonprofit, nonpartisan sister organizations that support the Latino community. The latter is as a third party voter registration organization.

Mi Familia en Acci贸n confirmed that the video shows a voter registration drive it hosted in Palm Beach and that the worker is a temporary paid canvasser, but refuted the baseless implication about fraudulent activities related to the event.

鈥淢i Familia en Acci贸n is a non-partisan organization, voter registrations are part of our day-to-day work to strengthen our democracy,鈥 the organization wrote in a statement. 鈥淲e do not encourage or register non-citizens to vote.鈥

Buongiorno told The Associated Press that he is 鈥100% concerned that they鈥檙e registering noncitizens鈥 and that Florida鈥檚 current laws 鈥渁re disenfranchising citizens from coming out and voting.鈥

鈥淚鈥檓 concerned of fraudulent registrations by noncitizens, I鈥檓 concerned about synthetic identities, and we need to tighten this up in the state of Florida or our elected officials who certify the elections, they鈥檒l be committing perjury when they certify the 2024 election,鈥 he continued.

Although it is true Florida voters are not required to provide proof of citizenship when registering to vote, all voters in the state must be U.S. citizens, according to and law. They must confirm as much under penalty of perjury upon registration. Voting as a noncitizen, or even just registering to vote, can be punishable by fines, prison or deportation.

Though there have been incidences of noncitizen voting over the years across the U.S., it鈥檚 , in part because of the risk involved. States, including Florida, have additional mechanisms to prevent it, though there isn鈥檛 one standard protocol they all follow.

鈥淧eople, by and large, do not falsely submit voter registration applications when they don鈥檛 believe that they鈥檙e eligible because the risk is just too high,鈥 Valencia Richardson, legal counsel for voting rights at the Campaign Legal Center, told the AP. 鈥淭he consequences, particularly for noncitizens, are simply not worth it.鈥

A in other states allow noncitizens to vote in some local elections. Noncitizens are never allowed to cast ballots at the federal or state level.

Richardson explained that both and law require Florida election officials to maintain accurate voter lists. This means removing anyone who is ineligible to vote, including noncitizens, but also ensuring that eligible voters are not unlawfully removed. She said there are many ways to confirm citizenship, such as checking department of motor vehicle records, asking the secretary of state鈥檚 office or getting in touch with the voter themselves.

The Florida Department of State did not respond to a request for comment.

in several states show that there have been noncitizens who successfully registered to vote and cast ballots, although it happens rarely and is typically by mistake.

Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose, for example, on the state鈥檚 rolls 鈥 out of roughly 8 million voters 鈥 and said he was taking action to confirm and remove them.

In 2023, Florida removed 268,521 active voters from its registration rolls and as of May 31, had removed 113,166 in 2024 so far. does not break down why they were removed. In addition to not being a U.S. citizen, reasons for removal can include death, a felony conviction, not listing a valid Florida residence, or moving out of state.

Florida approximately 13.4 million active registered voters. When registering, new applicants a Florida driver鈥檚 license or identification card number, or the last four digits of their social security number. Alternative forms of ID for those who do not have any of these numbers include a U.S. passport, debit or credit card number, utility bill, or bank statement. a picture ID with their signature when voting at a polling place.

The House the SAVE (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility) Act, a Republican proposal that would institute a proof-of-citizenship requirement for voter registration. It is unlikely to advance through the Democratic-led Senate and the Biden administration said it鈥檚 to the legislation because it says safeguards already are in place to verify voter eligibility and enforce the law against noncitizens trying to cast ballots. Democrats are also concerned that the bill would disenfranchise some U.S. citizens.

___

CLAIM: Ukraine is responsible for a that hit the Okhmatdyt children鈥檚 hospital in Kyiv on Monday.

THE FACTS: Ukraine鈥檚 Security Service wrote in a statement on Telegram that it from a Russian Kh-101 cruise missile at the hospital and has opened proceedings on war crime charges. The Russian Defense Ministry in a Telegram post that images from Kyiv showed the damage was caused by a Ukrainian air defense missile. As supposed proof of Ukraine鈥檚 responsibility, social media users shared , falsely claiming they showed shrapnel from such missiles that was found at the hospital following Monday鈥檚 attack.

After Ukraine鈥檚 largest children鈥檚 hospital was struck as part of a daytime barrage that saw target five Ukrainian cities, posts circulated social media falsely claiming that Ukraine was at fault for the hit.

鈥淯kraine blew up their own children鈥檚 hospital in Kiev this morning with an American air defense missile,鈥 reads one X post that had received approximately 9,200 likes and more than 4,300 shares as of Monday. 鈥淪top sending these TERRORISTS BOMBS @POTUS.鈥

But Ukraine鈥檚 Security Service that it found wreckage from a Russian Kh-101 cruise missile at the site 鈥 including fragments of the rear hull with a serial number and a rudder 鈥 and opened proceedings on war crimes.

The Kh-101 is an air-launched missile that flies low to avoid detection by radar. Ukraine said it shot down 11 of 13 Kh-101 missiles launched Monday, . The International Criminal Court鈥檚 says it is a war crime to intentionally attack 鈥渉ospitals and places where the sick and wounded are collected, provided they are not military objectives.鈥

Russia鈥檚 Defense Ministry, , said the strikes targeted Ukrainian defense plants and military air bases and were successful. It denied aiming at any civilian facilities and claimed without evidence that pictures from Kyiv indicated the damage at the hospital was caused by a Ukrainian air defense missile.

Since early in the Russia-Ukraine war that is well into its third year, Russian officials have that Moscow鈥檚 forces never attack civilian infrastructure in Ukraine, despite abundant evidence to the contrary, including AP reporting.

Some posts are sharing photos they claim show shrapnel from Ukrainian air defense missiles found at the hospital as supposed evidence that Ukraine is at fault for the attack. One image has been online and another .

were originally posted on Telegram by a Ukrainian media outlet with the caption, 鈥淒ebris from rockets is found in Kyiv after a massive rocket attack.鈥 The post, written in Ukrainian, does not specify what kind of rockets the debris is from or where in Kyiv it was found.

At least 31 people were killed and more than 150 wounded in Monday鈥檚 missile barrage, . It was Russia鈥檚 heaviest bombardment of Kyiv in almost four months, hitting seven of the city鈥檚 10 districts. Seven people were killed in the capital, including two staff members at the hospital, where three children were hurt. Strikes in Kryvyi Rih, Zelenskyy鈥檚 birthplace in central Ukraine, killed 10.

The attack unfolded a day before Western leaders who have backed Ukraine were scheduled to begin a three-day in Washington to consider how they can reassure Kyiv of the alliance鈥檚 and that their country can survive Europe鈥檚 biggest conflict since World War II. ___

Find AP Fact Checks here:

Melissa Goldin, The Associated Press

push icon
Be the first to read breaking stories. Enable push notifications on your device. Disable anytime.
No thanks